American liberals stand betrayed. Their new president, the one they sweated to elect — a brilliant, charismatic leader with a professional background in constitutional law — has transmogrified himself from the champion who denounced in his campaign the illegalities of the Bush White House into a president bent on their perpetuation.
full article here: http://www.infowars.com/obama-betrays-the-liberals/
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
Monday, May 18, 2009
Obama Continues Torture and Torture-related Murder in the Bogus War on Terror
Obama Continues Torture and Torture-related Murder in the Bogus War on Terror
http://www.infowars.com/obama-continues-torture-and-torture-related-murder-in-the-bogus-war-on-terror/
Kurt NimmoInfowarsMay 17, 2009
Lost in all the blather about Nancy Pelosi, the CIA, and torture is a stark fact generally ignored by the corporate media and the Sunday news show talking heads — not only did the United States torture, it murdered the tortured.
John Sifton, a reporter and researcher for Human Rights, wrote about the estimated 100 detainees murdered in May 5 for The Daily Beast, but his report was more or less ignored. David Edwards and Stephen Webster picked up the story on May 15 for Raw Story after Amy Goodman of Democracy Now interviewed Sifton (see video on this page).
As Sifton told Goodman, Human Right Watch and other groups knew about the torture-homicides back in 2003. “The killings, at least some of them, have hardly been kept secret,” writes Sifton. “As early as May-June 2003, The New York Times and Washington Post reported on deaths of detainees in Afghanistan. Two detainees at Bagram air base died after extensive beatings by U.S. troops in December 2002 — a case reported by The New York Times and that was also the subject of the Oscar-winning documentary Taxi to the Dark Side. Another death involved a man beaten to death by a CIA contractor at a base in Asadabad, in eastern Afghanistan, in June 2003.”
Human Rights First determined in 2006 that nearly 100 detainees died in U.S. custody in Afghanistan and Iraq facilities as of 2005, and that almost half of the cases were clearly homicides. “The government is not unaware of these homicides. In April 2006, a colleague of mine at Human Rights Watch and I met with Department of Justice criminal-division officials and requested information and updates on this case and several others. Justice officials were familiar with these cases, but our pleas for information were rejected,” writes Sifton.
“The bottom line is that many detainee homicides in Iraq and Afghanistan were the direct result of approval and orders from the highest levels of government, and that high officials in the government are accomplices. Any meaningful investigation of those homicides would reveal the initial authorizations and their link to the homicides.”
John Sifton says Attorney General Eric Holder and the Department of Justice cannot conclude their deliberations about Bush-era torture policies without closely investigating the homicide cases tied to them.
The Obama administration has used a “legal parlor trick” to make sure torture — and presumably torture-murder — continues, according to James Hill, a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery. On January 22, 2009, Obama signed a number of executive orders supposedly designed to end the Bush administration’s abusive practices in dealing with terrorism suspects, but these contain loopholes big enough to drive a Mack truck through, Hill noted on January 26, 2009. “Labeling detainees the product of counterterrorism operations rather than of armed conflict, or holding detainees in detention facilities operated by entities other than the CIA, may allow government agents and private contractors conforming to the letter of the president’s order to continue practices most would consider torture.”
“Obama insisted that investigations of Bush-Cheney would disturb the Toscanini-like symphony he had promised to the political class in the corridors of power,” writes Bruce Fein. “In sweeping the Bush-Cheney lawlessness under the rug, Obama has set a precedent of whitewashing White House lawlessness in the name of national security that will lie around like a loaded weapon ready for resurrection by any commander in chief eager to appear ‘tough on terrorism’ and to exploit popular fear. Obama urges that the crimes were justified because the duumvirate acted to protect the nation from international terrorism.”
In other words, the “the political class in the corridors of power” will make certain such crimes continue, as there is little difference between the Bush and Obama administrations. Obama, or rather the “political class” that pulls his strings, “will do whatever is required,” especially if he sees “information that would” change his mind about the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques,” that is to say torture and murder (see President Obama Won’t Rule Out Torture).
Last month, Obama and leading Democrats indicated they will block any independent commission to investigate torture (and murder). “According to press reports, Obama told Congressional Democrats that any sort of investigation of the torture, which was carried out on the orders of top officials and in blatant violation of domestic and international law, would use up too much time and would likely expand into other areas of Bush administration criminality,” Tom Eley wrote on April 27. “Now in power, the Democrats have no intention of dissolving the panoply of anti-democratic measures enacted by the Bush administration in the ‘war on terror.’ Indeed, the Obama Justice Department has gone into court repeatedly in an attempt to quash legal challenges to torture, extraordinary rendition and illegal domestic spying.”
Not only will the torture-murder of hapless detainees continue, but the mass murder juggernaut Obama inherited — or rather now represents as the selected front man — will continue to roll on with its macabre and criminal death dance. So far, according to the prestigious medical journal Lancet and other investigations, well over a million Iraqis have died as a direct result of the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq, a number that exceeds the 800,000 to 900,000 believed killed in the Rwandan genocide in 1994, and is approaching the number (1.7 million) who died in Cambodia (with U.S. support of the murderous Khmer Rouge).
Obama has promised to add numbers to the death toll in Afghanistan and Pakistan where “Obama will… continue his predecessor’s policies in the region… to protect the oil pipelines, and to resume the encircling of Russia and China under the guise of wanting to destroy the mythical Al Qaeda and its leader the late OBL,” as the Rev. Richard Skaff notes. Obama is dedicated to “the mythical and contrived war on terror” and will continue “the policy of the previous administration and of the money masters. Obama like every other president, chose expediency over truth and justice. He is after all another front man, namely a politician.”
Torture and torture-related murder are merely additional tools in the “mythical and contrived war on terror,” as Obama insists.
http://www.infowars.com/obama-continues-torture-and-torture-related-murder-in-the-bogus-war-on-terror/
http://www.infowars.com/obama-continues-torture-and-torture-related-murder-in-the-bogus-war-on-terror/
Kurt NimmoInfowarsMay 17, 2009
Lost in all the blather about Nancy Pelosi, the CIA, and torture is a stark fact generally ignored by the corporate media and the Sunday news show talking heads — not only did the United States torture, it murdered the tortured.
John Sifton, a reporter and researcher for Human Rights, wrote about the estimated 100 detainees murdered in May 5 for The Daily Beast, but his report was more or less ignored. David Edwards and Stephen Webster picked up the story on May 15 for Raw Story after Amy Goodman of Democracy Now interviewed Sifton (see video on this page).
As Sifton told Goodman, Human Right Watch and other groups knew about the torture-homicides back in 2003. “The killings, at least some of them, have hardly been kept secret,” writes Sifton. “As early as May-June 2003, The New York Times and Washington Post reported on deaths of detainees in Afghanistan. Two detainees at Bagram air base died after extensive beatings by U.S. troops in December 2002 — a case reported by The New York Times and that was also the subject of the Oscar-winning documentary Taxi to the Dark Side. Another death involved a man beaten to death by a CIA contractor at a base in Asadabad, in eastern Afghanistan, in June 2003.”
Human Rights First determined in 2006 that nearly 100 detainees died in U.S. custody in Afghanistan and Iraq facilities as of 2005, and that almost half of the cases were clearly homicides. “The government is not unaware of these homicides. In April 2006, a colleague of mine at Human Rights Watch and I met with Department of Justice criminal-division officials and requested information and updates on this case and several others. Justice officials were familiar with these cases, but our pleas for information were rejected,” writes Sifton.
“The bottom line is that many detainee homicides in Iraq and Afghanistan were the direct result of approval and orders from the highest levels of government, and that high officials in the government are accomplices. Any meaningful investigation of those homicides would reveal the initial authorizations and their link to the homicides.”
John Sifton says Attorney General Eric Holder and the Department of Justice cannot conclude their deliberations about Bush-era torture policies without closely investigating the homicide cases tied to them.
The Obama administration has used a “legal parlor trick” to make sure torture — and presumably torture-murder — continues, according to James Hill, a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery. On January 22, 2009, Obama signed a number of executive orders supposedly designed to end the Bush administration’s abusive practices in dealing with terrorism suspects, but these contain loopholes big enough to drive a Mack truck through, Hill noted on January 26, 2009. “Labeling detainees the product of counterterrorism operations rather than of armed conflict, or holding detainees in detention facilities operated by entities other than the CIA, may allow government agents and private contractors conforming to the letter of the president’s order to continue practices most would consider torture.”
“Obama insisted that investigations of Bush-Cheney would disturb the Toscanini-like symphony he had promised to the political class in the corridors of power,” writes Bruce Fein. “In sweeping the Bush-Cheney lawlessness under the rug, Obama has set a precedent of whitewashing White House lawlessness in the name of national security that will lie around like a loaded weapon ready for resurrection by any commander in chief eager to appear ‘tough on terrorism’ and to exploit popular fear. Obama urges that the crimes were justified because the duumvirate acted to protect the nation from international terrorism.”
In other words, the “the political class in the corridors of power” will make certain such crimes continue, as there is little difference between the Bush and Obama administrations. Obama, or rather the “political class” that pulls his strings, “will do whatever is required,” especially if he sees “information that would” change his mind about the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques,” that is to say torture and murder (see President Obama Won’t Rule Out Torture).
Last month, Obama and leading Democrats indicated they will block any independent commission to investigate torture (and murder). “According to press reports, Obama told Congressional Democrats that any sort of investigation of the torture, which was carried out on the orders of top officials and in blatant violation of domestic and international law, would use up too much time and would likely expand into other areas of Bush administration criminality,” Tom Eley wrote on April 27. “Now in power, the Democrats have no intention of dissolving the panoply of anti-democratic measures enacted by the Bush administration in the ‘war on terror.’ Indeed, the Obama Justice Department has gone into court repeatedly in an attempt to quash legal challenges to torture, extraordinary rendition and illegal domestic spying.”
Not only will the torture-murder of hapless detainees continue, but the mass murder juggernaut Obama inherited — or rather now represents as the selected front man — will continue to roll on with its macabre and criminal death dance. So far, according to the prestigious medical journal Lancet and other investigations, well over a million Iraqis have died as a direct result of the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq, a number that exceeds the 800,000 to 900,000 believed killed in the Rwandan genocide in 1994, and is approaching the number (1.7 million) who died in Cambodia (with U.S. support of the murderous Khmer Rouge).
Obama has promised to add numbers to the death toll in Afghanistan and Pakistan where “Obama will… continue his predecessor’s policies in the region… to protect the oil pipelines, and to resume the encircling of Russia and China under the guise of wanting to destroy the mythical Al Qaeda and its leader the late OBL,” as the Rev. Richard Skaff notes. Obama is dedicated to “the mythical and contrived war on terror” and will continue “the policy of the previous administration and of the money masters. Obama like every other president, chose expediency over truth and justice. He is after all another front man, namely a politician.”
Torture and torture-related murder are merely additional tools in the “mythical and contrived war on terror,” as Obama insists.
http://www.infowars.com/obama-continues-torture-and-torture-related-murder-in-the-bogus-war-on-terror/
Sunday, May 17, 2009
Read their words, make a prediction.
I predict that by 2011 the united states will have signed a treaty for the international criminal court.
how can i make such a prediction?
because the people who run the world, said they will.
read here:http://www.infowars.com/tucker-from-greece-bilderbergers-own-president-obama/
how can i make such a prediction?
because the people who run the world, said they will.
read here:http://www.infowars.com/tucker-from-greece-bilderbergers-own-president-obama/
Solidad O'brien blames "the people" for the economic crisis.
The organization "we are change Ohio" confronted soledad O'brien about the Bilderberg group.
listen carefully to her answer.
when asked about the group's involvement in the current economic crisis, she says it's
"not that simple"
She then goes on to say that ultimately its "our responsibility" and that it is "really as simple as that."
You could see the fear in her as she attempted to answer the question.
You could hear the nervous laugh.
but ultimately.
her answer was intellectual diarrhea.
She didn't address any of the underlying points,
1. that the housing bubble was accurately predicted because of information from a mole inside bilderberg.
2. That American politicians meet with world leaders without public knowledge.
3. Or if CNN will cover the story.
incredibly powerful video here: http://www.infowars.com/wearechange-ohio-confronts-soledad-o%E2%80%99brien-about-bilderberg/
listen carefully to her answer.
when asked about the group's involvement in the current economic crisis, she says it's
"not that simple"
She then goes on to say that ultimately its "our responsibility" and that it is "really as simple as that."
You could see the fear in her as she attempted to answer the question.
You could hear the nervous laugh.
but ultimately.
her answer was intellectual diarrhea.
She didn't address any of the underlying points,
1. that the housing bubble was accurately predicted because of information from a mole inside bilderberg.
2. That American politicians meet with world leaders without public knowledge.
3. Or if CNN will cover the story.
incredibly powerful video here: http://www.infowars.com/wearechange-ohio-confronts-soledad-o%E2%80%99brien-about-bilderberg/
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Israeli spy cousin of 9/11 hijacker
a Lebanese man accused of spying for Israel has extremely interesting family ties.
One of Mr. Jarrah’s cousins, Ziad al-Jarrah, was among the 19 hijackers who carried out the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/19/world/middleeast/19lebanon.html?_r=2&hp
One of Mr. Jarrah’s cousins, Ziad al-Jarrah, was among the 19 hijackers who carried out the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/19/world/middleeast/19lebanon.html?_r=2&hp
Don't vaccinate your kids
these are excerpts from
DISPELLING VACCINATION MYTHS: An Introduction to the Contradictions Between Medical Science and Immunization Policy
Alan Phillips, Director of Citizens for Healthcare Freedom
entire article :http://www.vaclib.org/docs/myths.htm#sdendnote70sym
The Federal government VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) was established by Congress under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Act of 1986. It receives about 11,000 reports of serious adverse reactions to vaccinations annually, which include as many as one to two hundred deaths, and several times that number of permanent disabilities
VAERS officials report that 15% of adverse events are “serious” (emergency room trip, hospitalization, life-threatening episode, permanent disability, death). Independent analysis of VAERS reports has revealed that up to 50% of reported adverse events for the Hepatitis B vaccine are “serious.”
The FDA estimates that as few as 1% of serious adverse reactions to vaccines are reported,3,4 and the CDC admits that only about 10% of such events are reported.
The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC, a grassroots organization founded by parents of vaccine-injured and killed children) has conducted its own investigations.7 It reported: “In New York, only one out of 40 doctor's offices confirmed that they report a death or injury following vaccination.” In other words, 97.5% of vaccine related deaths and disabilities go unreported there. Implications about medical ethics aside (federal law directs doctors to report serious adverse events 8), these findings suggest that vaccine deaths and serious injuries actually occurring may be from 10 to 100 times greater than the number reported.
Studies internationally have shown vaccination to be a cause of SIDS9,10 (SIDS, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, is a “catch-all” diagnosis given when the specific cause of death is unknown; estimates range from 5,000 to 10,000 cases each year in the US). One study found the peak incidence of SIDS occurred at the ages of 2 and 4 months in the U.S., precisely when the first two routine immunizations are given,11
-another study found a clear pattern of correlation extending three weeks after immunization
Another study found that 3,000 children die within 4 days of vaccination each year in the U.S. while yet another researcher’s studies led to the conclusion that at least half of SIDS cases are caused by vaccines.12
Measles, mumps, small pox, pertussis, polio and Hib outbreaks have all occurred in vaccinated populations.19,20,21,22,23
An 8-pound 2-month-old baby receives the same dosage as a 40 pound five year old. Infants with immature, undeveloped immune systems may receive five or more times the dosage, relative to body weight, as older children
Finally, vaccines are administered with the assumption that all recipients—regardless of race, culture, diet, genetic makeup, geographic location, or any other characteristic—will respond the same. This was perhaps never more dramatically disproved than in Australia's Northern Territory a few years ago, where stepped-up immunization campaigns in native aborigines resulted in an incredible 50% infant mortality rate.47 One must wonder about the lives of the survivors, too; if half died, surely the other half did not escape unaffected.
YOUR RIGHTS
In the U.S., vaccine laws vary from state to state. While every state legally requires vaccines, every state also has one or more legal exemptions from vaccines. School and health officials will seldom volunteer exemption information, and are sometimes misinformed about legal exemptions, so it is important to check the laws in your state to find out exactly what the requirements are. Each state offers one or more of the following three kinds of exemptions:
1) Medical Exemption: All 50 states in the U.S. allow for a medical exemption. However, few pediatricians check for indications of increased risk before administering vaccines, so it is advisable for parents to research this matter for themselves if they have reason to believe that their child may be predisposed to vaccine reactions. Epilepsy, severe allergies, and a previous adverse reaction in a child or sibling are but a few of the many conditions in child or family history which may increase the chances of an adverse reaction, and thus may qualify for a medical exemption from one or more required vaccines. In general, though, medical exemptions are difficult to get, may be available only to those who have already had a serious vaccine reaction or who have a family history of serious vaccine reactions, may be granted only for the specific vaccine believed to have caused a previous reaction, and may be valid only as long as the condition giving rise to the exemption persists (i.e., may be temporary).
2) Religious Exemption: 48 states allow for a religious exemption (all but MS and WV). A state’s laws may state that membership in an established religious organization is required. However, this requirement has been held unconstitutional in New York federal courts; personal religious beliefs are sufficient for a religious exemption, regardless of which religious organization you belong to, or whether or not you belong to an organized religion at all.67,68,69,70 In one case, the plaintiffs were awarded money damages when the court found that the state had violated their civil rights by denying them a religious exemption.
3) Philosophical or Personal Exemption: Approximately 17 states allow parents to refuse vaccination for personal or philosophical reasons.
It is worth noting that exempted children may be banned from attending schools during local outbreaks. But all schools, public or private, must comply with state vaccination laws and honor legal exemptions.
In the December 1994 Medical Post, Canadian author of the best-seller Medical Mafia, Guylaine Lanctot, M.D., stated, “The medical authorities keep lying. Vaccination has been a disaster on the immune system. It actually causes a lot of illnesses. We are actually changing our genetic code through vaccination...100 years from now we will know that the biggest crime against humanity was vaccines.” After critically analyzing literally ten’s of thousands of pages of the vaccine medical literature, Dr. Viera Scheibner concluded that “there is no evidence whatsoever of the ability of vaccines to prevent any diseases. To the contrary, there is a great wealth of evidence that they cause serious side effects.”76
ENDNOTES
3 Less than 1%, according to Barbara Fisher, citing former FDA Commissioner David Kessler, 1993, JAMA, in the Statement of the NVIC, supra note 2.
4 Less than 10%, according to KM Severyn, R.Ph., Ph.D. in the Dayton Daily News, May 28, 1993. (Vaccine Policy Institute, 251 Ridgeway Dr., Dayton, OH 45459)
7 National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), 512 Maple Ave. W. #206, Vienna, VA 22180, 703-938-0342; "Investigative Report on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System."
8 42 U.S.C.S. § 300aa-25(b)(1)(A),(B).
9 Karlsson L. Scheibner V. Association between non-specific stress syndrome, DPT injections and cot death. Paper presented to the 2nd immunization conference, Canberra, Australia, May 27-29, 1992. See also Viera Schiebner, Ph.D., Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox Research Shows that Vaccines Represent a Medical Assault on the Immune System for discussion and references.
10 W.C. Torch, "Diptheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immunization: A potential cause of the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)," (Amer. Academy of Neurology, 34th Annual Meeting, Apr 25 - May 1, 1982), Neurology 32(4), pt. 2.
11 Id.
12 Viera Schiebner, Ph.D., Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox Research Shows that Vaccines Represent a Medical Assault on the Immune System, 1993.
19 Measles vaccine failures: lack of sustained measles specific immunoglobulin G responses in revaccinated adolescents and young adults. Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 13(1):34-8, 1994 Jan.
20 Measles outbreak in 31 schools: risk factors for vaccine failure and evaluation of a selective revaccination strategy. Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, University of Toronto, Ont. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 150(7):1093-8, 1994 Apr 1.
21 Haemophilus b disease after vaccination with Haemophilus b polysaccharide or conjugate vaccine. Institution Division of Bacterial Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, Md 20892. American Journal of Diseases of Children. 145(12):1379-82, 1991 Dec.
22 Sustained transmission of mumps in a highly vaccinated population: assessment of primary vaccine failure and waning vaccine-induced immunity. Division of Field Epidemiology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 169(1):77-82, 1994 Jan. 1.
23 Secondary measles vaccine failure in healthcare workers exposed to infected patients. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA 19104. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 14(2):81-6, 1993 Feb.
47 Archie Kalolerinos, MD, Every Second Child, Keats Publishing, Inc. 1981.
66 Isaac Golden, Vaccination? A Review of Risks and Alternatives, 5th Edition, 1994. (Australia).
67 Allanson v. Clinton Central School District, No. CV 84-174, slip op. at 5 (N.D.N.Y. 1984).
68 Sherr and Levy vs. Northport East-Northport Union Free School District, 672 F. Supp. 81 (E.D.N.Y. 1987).
69 Fishkin v. Yonkers Public Schools, 710 F. Supp. 506 (S.D.N.Y. 1989).
70 Berg v. Glen Cove City School District, 853 F. Supp. 651 (E.D.N.Y. 1994).
76 Viera Scheibner, PhD, 178 Govetts Leap Road, Blackheath, NSW 2785, Australia; phone +61 (0)2 4787 8203, Fax +61 (0)2 4787 8988
DISPELLING VACCINATION MYTHS: An Introduction to the Contradictions Between Medical Science and Immunization Policy
Alan Phillips, Director of Citizens for Healthcare Freedom
entire article :http://www.vaclib.org/docs/myths.htm#sdendnote70sym
The Federal government VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) was established by Congress under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Act of 1986. It receives about 11,000 reports of serious adverse reactions to vaccinations annually, which include as many as one to two hundred deaths, and several times that number of permanent disabilities
VAERS officials report that 15% of adverse events are “serious” (emergency room trip, hospitalization, life-threatening episode, permanent disability, death). Independent analysis of VAERS reports has revealed that up to 50% of reported adverse events for the Hepatitis B vaccine are “serious.”
The FDA estimates that as few as 1% of serious adverse reactions to vaccines are reported,3,4 and the CDC admits that only about 10% of such events are reported.
The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC, a grassroots organization founded by parents of vaccine-injured and killed children) has conducted its own investigations.7 It reported: “In New York, only one out of 40 doctor's offices confirmed that they report a death or injury following vaccination.” In other words, 97.5% of vaccine related deaths and disabilities go unreported there. Implications about medical ethics aside (federal law directs doctors to report serious adverse events 8), these findings suggest that vaccine deaths and serious injuries actually occurring may be from 10 to 100 times greater than the number reported.
Studies internationally have shown vaccination to be a cause of SIDS9,10 (SIDS, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, is a “catch-all” diagnosis given when the specific cause of death is unknown; estimates range from 5,000 to 10,000 cases each year in the US). One study found the peak incidence of SIDS occurred at the ages of 2 and 4 months in the U.S., precisely when the first two routine immunizations are given,11
-another study found a clear pattern of correlation extending three weeks after immunization
Another study found that 3,000 children die within 4 days of vaccination each year in the U.S. while yet another researcher’s studies led to the conclusion that at least half of SIDS cases are caused by vaccines.12
Measles, mumps, small pox, pertussis, polio and Hib outbreaks have all occurred in vaccinated populations.19,20,21,22,23
An 8-pound 2-month-old baby receives the same dosage as a 40 pound five year old. Infants with immature, undeveloped immune systems may receive five or more times the dosage, relative to body weight, as older children
Finally, vaccines are administered with the assumption that all recipients—regardless of race, culture, diet, genetic makeup, geographic location, or any other characteristic—will respond the same. This was perhaps never more dramatically disproved than in Australia's Northern Territory a few years ago, where stepped-up immunization campaigns in native aborigines resulted in an incredible 50% infant mortality rate.47 One must wonder about the lives of the survivors, too; if half died, surely the other half did not escape unaffected.
YOUR RIGHTS
In the U.S., vaccine laws vary from state to state. While every state legally requires vaccines, every state also has one or more legal exemptions from vaccines. School and health officials will seldom volunteer exemption information, and are sometimes misinformed about legal exemptions, so it is important to check the laws in your state to find out exactly what the requirements are. Each state offers one or more of the following three kinds of exemptions:
1) Medical Exemption: All 50 states in the U.S. allow for a medical exemption. However, few pediatricians check for indications of increased risk before administering vaccines, so it is advisable for parents to research this matter for themselves if they have reason to believe that their child may be predisposed to vaccine reactions. Epilepsy, severe allergies, and a previous adverse reaction in a child or sibling are but a few of the many conditions in child or family history which may increase the chances of an adverse reaction, and thus may qualify for a medical exemption from one or more required vaccines. In general, though, medical exemptions are difficult to get, may be available only to those who have already had a serious vaccine reaction or who have a family history of serious vaccine reactions, may be granted only for the specific vaccine believed to have caused a previous reaction, and may be valid only as long as the condition giving rise to the exemption persists (i.e., may be temporary).
2) Religious Exemption: 48 states allow for a religious exemption (all but MS and WV). A state’s laws may state that membership in an established religious organization is required. However, this requirement has been held unconstitutional in New York federal courts; personal religious beliefs are sufficient for a religious exemption, regardless of which religious organization you belong to, or whether or not you belong to an organized religion at all.67,68,69,70 In one case, the plaintiffs were awarded money damages when the court found that the state had violated their civil rights by denying them a religious exemption.
3) Philosophical or Personal Exemption: Approximately 17 states allow parents to refuse vaccination for personal or philosophical reasons.
It is worth noting that exempted children may be banned from attending schools during local outbreaks. But all schools, public or private, must comply with state vaccination laws and honor legal exemptions.
In the December 1994 Medical Post, Canadian author of the best-seller Medical Mafia, Guylaine Lanctot, M.D., stated, “The medical authorities keep lying. Vaccination has been a disaster on the immune system. It actually causes a lot of illnesses. We are actually changing our genetic code through vaccination...100 years from now we will know that the biggest crime against humanity was vaccines.” After critically analyzing literally ten’s of thousands of pages of the vaccine medical literature, Dr. Viera Scheibner concluded that “there is no evidence whatsoever of the ability of vaccines to prevent any diseases. To the contrary, there is a great wealth of evidence that they cause serious side effects.”76
ENDNOTES
3 Less than 1%, according to Barbara Fisher, citing former FDA Commissioner David Kessler, 1993, JAMA, in the Statement of the NVIC, supra note 2.
4 Less than 10%, according to KM Severyn, R.Ph., Ph.D. in the Dayton Daily News, May 28, 1993. (Vaccine Policy Institute, 251 Ridgeway Dr., Dayton, OH 45459)
7 National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), 512 Maple Ave. W. #206, Vienna, VA 22180, 703-938-0342; "Investigative Report on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System."
8 42 U.S.C.S. § 300aa-25(b)(1)(A),(B).
9 Karlsson L. Scheibner V. Association between non-specific stress syndrome, DPT injections and cot death. Paper presented to the 2nd immunization conference, Canberra, Australia, May 27-29, 1992. See also Viera Schiebner, Ph.D., Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox Research Shows that Vaccines Represent a Medical Assault on the Immune System for discussion and references.
10 W.C. Torch, "Diptheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immunization: A potential cause of the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)," (Amer. Academy of Neurology, 34th Annual Meeting, Apr 25 - May 1, 1982), Neurology 32(4), pt. 2.
11 Id.
12 Viera Schiebner, Ph.D., Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox Research Shows that Vaccines Represent a Medical Assault on the Immune System, 1993.
19 Measles vaccine failures: lack of sustained measles specific immunoglobulin G responses in revaccinated adolescents and young adults. Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 13(1):34-8, 1994 Jan.
20 Measles outbreak in 31 schools: risk factors for vaccine failure and evaluation of a selective revaccination strategy. Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, University of Toronto, Ont. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 150(7):1093-8, 1994 Apr 1.
21 Haemophilus b disease after vaccination with Haemophilus b polysaccharide or conjugate vaccine. Institution Division of Bacterial Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, Md 20892. American Journal of Diseases of Children. 145(12):1379-82, 1991 Dec.
22 Sustained transmission of mumps in a highly vaccinated population: assessment of primary vaccine failure and waning vaccine-induced immunity. Division of Field Epidemiology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 169(1):77-82, 1994 Jan. 1.
23 Secondary measles vaccine failure in healthcare workers exposed to infected patients. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA 19104. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 14(2):81-6, 1993 Feb.
47 Archie Kalolerinos, MD, Every Second Child, Keats Publishing, Inc. 1981.
66 Isaac Golden, Vaccination? A Review of Risks and Alternatives, 5th Edition, 1994. (Australia).
67 Allanson v. Clinton Central School District, No. CV 84-174, slip op. at 5 (N.D.N.Y. 1984).
68 Sherr and Levy vs. Northport East-Northport Union Free School District, 672 F. Supp. 81 (E.D.N.Y. 1987).
69 Fishkin v. Yonkers Public Schools, 710 F. Supp. 506 (S.D.N.Y. 1989).
70 Berg v. Glen Cove City School District, 853 F. Supp. 651 (E.D.N.Y. 1994).
76 Viera Scheibner, PhD, 178 Govetts Leap Road, Blackheath, NSW 2785, Australia; phone +61 (0)2 4787 8203, Fax +61 (0)2 4787 8988
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Electronic Police State 2008
Electronic Police State 2008
Text size
CryptomeMay 12, 2009
Most of us are aware that our governments monitor nearly every form of electronic communication. We are also aware of private companies doing the same. This strikes most of us as slightly troubling, but very few of us say or do much about it. There are two primary reasons for this:
In this scene from Das leben Der Anderen (The Lives of Others), Stasi agents bug a target’s flat. That was then, this is now. Now the government has invasive technology that makes the Stasi’s crude bugging equipment look like child’s play.
1. We really don’t see how it is going to hurt us. Mass surveillance is certainly a new, odd, and perhaps an ominous thing, but we just don’t see a complete picture or a smoking gun.
2. We are constantly surrounded with messages that say, “Only crazy people complain about the government.”
However, the biggest obstacle to our understanding is this: The usual image of a “police state” includes secret police dragging people out of their homes at night, with scenes out of Nazi Germany or Stalin’s USSR. The problem with these images is that they are horribly outdated. That’s how things worked during your grandfather’s war — that is not how things work now.
An electronic police state is quiet, even unseen. All of its legal actions are supported by abundant evidence. It looks pristine.
An electronic police state is characterized by this:
State use of electronic technologies to record, organize, search and distribute forensic evidence against its citizens.
The two crucial facts about the information gathered under an electronic police state are these:
1. It is criminal evidence, ready for use in a trial.
2. It is gathered universally and silently, and only later organized for use in prosecutions.
In an Electronic Police State, every surveillance camera recording, every email you send, every Internet site you surf, every post you make, every check you write, every credit card swipe, every cell phone ping… are all criminal evidence, and they are held in searchable databases, for a long, long time. Whoever holds this evidence can make you look very, very bad whenever they care enough to do so. You can be prosecuted whenever they feel like it — the evidence is already in their database.
Perhaps you trust that your ruler will only use his evidence archives to hurt bad people. Will you also trust his successor? Do you also trust all of his subordinates, every government worker and every policeman? And, if some leader behaves badly, will you really stand up to oppose him or her? Would you still do it if he had all the emails you sent when you were depressed? Or if she has records of every porn site you’ve ever surfed? Or if he knows every phone call you’ve ever made? Or if she knows everyone you’ve ever sent money to? Such a person would have all of this and more — in the form of court-ready evidence — sitting in a database, waiting to be organized at the touch of a button.
This system hasn’t yet reached its full shape, but all of the basics are in place and it is not far from complete in some places. It is too late to prevent this — it is here. Our purpose in producing this report is to let people know that their liberty is in jeopardy and to help them understand how it is being undermined.
A national ranking. Download: Report
Text size
CryptomeMay 12, 2009
Most of us are aware that our governments monitor nearly every form of electronic communication. We are also aware of private companies doing the same. This strikes most of us as slightly troubling, but very few of us say or do much about it. There are two primary reasons for this:
In this scene from Das leben Der Anderen (The Lives of Others), Stasi agents bug a target’s flat. That was then, this is now. Now the government has invasive technology that makes the Stasi’s crude bugging equipment look like child’s play.
1. We really don’t see how it is going to hurt us. Mass surveillance is certainly a new, odd, and perhaps an ominous thing, but we just don’t see a complete picture or a smoking gun.
2. We are constantly surrounded with messages that say, “Only crazy people complain about the government.”
However, the biggest obstacle to our understanding is this: The usual image of a “police state” includes secret police dragging people out of their homes at night, with scenes out of Nazi Germany or Stalin’s USSR. The problem with these images is that they are horribly outdated. That’s how things worked during your grandfather’s war — that is not how things work now.
An electronic police state is quiet, even unseen. All of its legal actions are supported by abundant evidence. It looks pristine.
An electronic police state is characterized by this:
State use of electronic technologies to record, organize, search and distribute forensic evidence against its citizens.
The two crucial facts about the information gathered under an electronic police state are these:
1. It is criminal evidence, ready for use in a trial.
2. It is gathered universally and silently, and only later organized for use in prosecutions.
In an Electronic Police State, every surveillance camera recording, every email you send, every Internet site you surf, every post you make, every check you write, every credit card swipe, every cell phone ping… are all criminal evidence, and they are held in searchable databases, for a long, long time. Whoever holds this evidence can make you look very, very bad whenever they care enough to do so. You can be prosecuted whenever they feel like it — the evidence is already in their database.
Perhaps you trust that your ruler will only use his evidence archives to hurt bad people. Will you also trust his successor? Do you also trust all of his subordinates, every government worker and every policeman? And, if some leader behaves badly, will you really stand up to oppose him or her? Would you still do it if he had all the emails you sent when you were depressed? Or if she has records of every porn site you’ve ever surfed? Or if he knows every phone call you’ve ever made? Or if she knows everyone you’ve ever sent money to? Such a person would have all of this and more — in the form of court-ready evidence — sitting in a database, waiting to be organized at the touch of a button.
This system hasn’t yet reached its full shape, but all of the basics are in place and it is not far from complete in some places. It is too late to prevent this — it is here. Our purpose in producing this report is to let people know that their liberty is in jeopardy and to help them understand how it is being undermined.
A national ranking. Download: Report
Will We See Brain Scanning at the 2010 Olympics?
Brain scanning may be used in security checks
Owen Bowcott
guardian.co.uk, Sunday 10 May 2009 23.12 BST
Distinctive brain patterns could become the latest subject of biometric scanning after EU researchers successfully tested technology to verify identities for security checks.
The experiments, which also examined the potential of heart rhythms to authenticate individuals, were conducted under an EU-funded inquiry into biometric systems that could be deployed at airports, borders and in sensitive locations to screen out terrorist suspects.
Another series of tests fitted a "sensing seat" to a truck to record each driver's characteristic seated posture in an attempt to spot whether commercial vehicles had been hijacked.
Details of the Humabio (Human Monitoring and Authentication using Biodynamic Indicators and Behaviourial Analysis) pilot projects have been published amid further evidence of biometric technologies penetrating everyday lives.
The Foreign Office plans to spend up to £15m on fixed and mobile security devices that use methods including "Facial recognition (two and/or three dimensional), fingerprint recognition, iris recognition and vein imaging palm recognition".
The biometric sensors and systems, it appears, will primarily be deployed to protect UK embassies around the world. The contract, about which the FCO declined to elaborate further, also mentions "surveillance" and "data collection" services.
The Home Office, meanwhile, has confirmed rapid expansion plans of automated facial recognition gates: 10 will be operating at major UK airports by August.
Passengers holding the latest generation of passports travelling through Manchester and Stansted are already being checked by facial-recognition cameras.
Biometric identity checks are also becoming more common in the world of commercial gadgets. New versions of computer laptops and mobile phones are entering the market with built-in fingerprint scanners to prevent other people running up large bills and misusing pilfered hi-tech equipment.
Among security experts there is a preference for developing biometric security devices that do not rely on measuring solely one physiological trait: offering choice makes scanning appear less intrusive and allows for double-checking.
The holy grail of the biometrics industry is a scanning mechanism that is socially acceptable in an era of mass transit and 100 per cent accurate. Researchers are eager to produce 'non-contact' biometric systems that can check any individuals identity at a distance.
The US government's secretive IARPA (Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity) is seeking development proposals to enhance such technologies. Insisting that it is not interested in 'contact-type' biometrics, it asks for ideas that will "significantly advance the intelligence community's ability to achieve high-confidence match performance ... [for] high fidelity biometric signatures".
The Humabio project, based in Greece, is involved more in blue-sky scientific thinking than in intelligence work. Its research, highlighted in the latest issue of Biometric Technology Today, is at a "pre-commercial, proof-of-concept stage".
Owen Bowcott
guardian.co.uk, Sunday 10 May 2009 23.12 BST
Distinctive brain patterns could become the latest subject of biometric scanning after EU researchers successfully tested technology to verify identities for security checks.
The experiments, which also examined the potential of heart rhythms to authenticate individuals, were conducted under an EU-funded inquiry into biometric systems that could be deployed at airports, borders and in sensitive locations to screen out terrorist suspects.
Another series of tests fitted a "sensing seat" to a truck to record each driver's characteristic seated posture in an attempt to spot whether commercial vehicles had been hijacked.
Details of the Humabio (Human Monitoring and Authentication using Biodynamic Indicators and Behaviourial Analysis) pilot projects have been published amid further evidence of biometric technologies penetrating everyday lives.
The Foreign Office plans to spend up to £15m on fixed and mobile security devices that use methods including "Facial recognition (two and/or three dimensional), fingerprint recognition, iris recognition and vein imaging palm recognition".
The biometric sensors and systems, it appears, will primarily be deployed to protect UK embassies around the world. The contract, about which the FCO declined to elaborate further, also mentions "surveillance" and "data collection" services.
The Home Office, meanwhile, has confirmed rapid expansion plans of automated facial recognition gates: 10 will be operating at major UK airports by August.
Passengers holding the latest generation of passports travelling through Manchester and Stansted are already being checked by facial-recognition cameras.
Biometric identity checks are also becoming more common in the world of commercial gadgets. New versions of computer laptops and mobile phones are entering the market with built-in fingerprint scanners to prevent other people running up large bills and misusing pilfered hi-tech equipment.
Among security experts there is a preference for developing biometric security devices that do not rely on measuring solely one physiological trait: offering choice makes scanning appear less intrusive and allows for double-checking.
The holy grail of the biometrics industry is a scanning mechanism that is socially acceptable in an era of mass transit and 100 per cent accurate. Researchers are eager to produce 'non-contact' biometric systems that can check any individuals identity at a distance.
The US government's secretive IARPA (Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity) is seeking development proposals to enhance such technologies. Insisting that it is not interested in 'contact-type' biometrics, it asks for ideas that will "significantly advance the intelligence community's ability to achieve high-confidence match performance ... [for] high fidelity biometric signatures".
The Humabio project, based in Greece, is involved more in blue-sky scientific thinking than in intelligence work. Its research, highlighted in the latest issue of Biometric Technology Today, is at a "pre-commercial, proof-of-concept stage".
Monday, May 11, 2009
Bill 42. Another loss of liberty at the hands of big brother
http://www.ffwdweekly.com/article/news-views/news/proposed-bar-law-alarms-privacy-advocates-3709/
it's so sad our government has to babysit us to this extreme..
pathetic......what's even more pathetic, is that we ALWAYS
bend over and take it..
by the way....this bill won't make anyone safer.
it's so sad our government has to babysit us to this extreme..
pathetic......what's even more pathetic, is that we ALWAYS
bend over and take it..
by the way....this bill won't make anyone safer.
Police use the crimes of a few, to spy on us all.
The whole point of police security camera was to reduce crime.
does it?
of course not.
now read about the abuses of personal liberty via Toronto's all seeing eye-in-the-sky.
http://toronto.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20090509/surveillance_cameras_090509/20090510/?hub=TorontoNewHome
does it?
of course not.
now read about the abuses of personal liberty via Toronto's all seeing eye-in-the-sky.
http://toronto.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20090509/surveillance_cameras_090509/20090510/?hub=TorontoNewHome
Sunday, May 10, 2009
High Crimes of Dick and Bush
Bush should be tried for war crimes for authorizing torture. It can be proven in a court of law that the executive order bush signed, authorized tactics that violate the Geneva convention.
here is the proof:
http://www.infowars.com/fbi-e-mail-says-bush-authorized-abuse-of-iraqis/
Cheney should be tried for treason because:
according to congressional testimony, vice president Cheney was in the PEOC (Presidential Emergency Operations Center) BEFORE the ""plane "" hit the pentagon.
it can also be proven, according to congressional testimony, that Cheney ordered the air force to "stand down". The PEOC has technology to see the same radar the FAA can see. Therefore Cheney literally WATCHED the plane fly into the pentagon.
CHENEY IS THE NUMBER ONE SUSPECT.
please read these 2 links.
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/455482/cheney_orders_norad_to_stand_down_as_flight_approaches_d_c/
&
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/011805_simplify_case.shtml
here is the proof:
http://www.infowars.com/fbi-e-mail-says-bush-authorized-abuse-of-iraqis/
Cheney should be tried for treason because:
according to congressional testimony, vice president Cheney was in the PEOC (Presidential Emergency Operations Center) BEFORE the ""plane "" hit the pentagon.
it can also be proven, according to congressional testimony, that Cheney ordered the air force to "stand down". The PEOC has technology to see the same radar the FAA can see. Therefore Cheney literally WATCHED the plane fly into the pentagon.
CHENEY IS THE NUMBER ONE SUSPECT.
please read these 2 links.
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/455482/cheney_orders_norad_to_stand_down_as_flight_approaches_d_c/
&
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/011805_simplify_case.shtml
America’s “Money Machine”
This is an interesting article by Stephen Lendman about America's money machine.
This is a MUST read for any Canadian who wants to understand who really controls Obama.
http://www.infowars.com/americas-money-machine/
This is a MUST read for any Canadian who wants to understand who really controls Obama.
http://www.infowars.com/americas-money-machine/
The Banker Manifesto of 1892
"We (the bankers) must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance. The Farmers Alliance and Knights of Labor organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them.
At the coming Omaha Convention to be held July 4th (1892), our men must attend and direct its movement, or else there will be set on foot such antagonism to our designs as may require force to overcome. This at the present time would be premature. We are not yet ready for such a crisis. Capital must protect itself in every possible manner through combination ( conspiracy) and legislation.
The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible.
When through the process of the law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.
History repeats itself in regular cycles. This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism of the world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism.
The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization known as the Democratic Party, and the question of protection with the reciprocity must be forced to view through the Republican Party.
By thus dividing voters, we can get them to expand their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to the common herd. Thus, by discrete action, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished." Revealed by Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. to the U.S. Congress sometime between 1907 and 1917.
THE BANKERS’ MANIFESTO OF 1934
Capital must protect itself in every way, through combination and through legislation. Debts must be collected and loans and mortgages foreclosed as soon as possible. When through a process of law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law applied by the central power of wealth, under control of leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders. This is well known among our principle men now engaged in forming an IMPERIALISM of capital to govern the world. By dividing the people we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us except as teachers of the common herd. Thus by discrete action we can secure for ourselves what has been generally planned and successfully accomplished.
At the coming Omaha Convention to be held July 4th (1892), our men must attend and direct its movement, or else there will be set on foot such antagonism to our designs as may require force to overcome. This at the present time would be premature. We are not yet ready for such a crisis. Capital must protect itself in every possible manner through combination ( conspiracy) and legislation.
The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible.
When through the process of the law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.
History repeats itself in regular cycles. This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism of the world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism.
The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization known as the Democratic Party, and the question of protection with the reciprocity must be forced to view through the Republican Party.
By thus dividing voters, we can get them to expand their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to the common herd. Thus, by discrete action, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished." Revealed by Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. to the U.S. Congress sometime between 1907 and 1917.
THE BANKERS’ MANIFESTO OF 1934
Capital must protect itself in every way, through combination and through legislation. Debts must be collected and loans and mortgages foreclosed as soon as possible. When through a process of law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law applied by the central power of wealth, under control of leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders. This is well known among our principle men now engaged in forming an IMPERIALISM of capital to govern the world. By dividing the people we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us except as teachers of the common herd. Thus by discrete action we can secure for ourselves what has been generally planned and successfully accomplished.
Saturday, May 9, 2009
It's all in the details.
This is a clear case of double speak, and double think. The government says one thing and does another. They manipulate us by slowly announcing their true intentions with any program, drip by drip.
here's proof in the pudding...
THIS IS AN AMAZING PARAGRAPH & Orwellian to the core. It's written by Jeremy Hainsworth in "the guardian" online.
"Canada plans to have 15,000 police officers, private security and military personnel at the Olympics, at an expected cost of at least $715 million. That's more than five times the original estimate, which didn't take into account the need to secure areas outside the official venues. "
5 TIMES! 5 TIMES the original estimate? Of course they KNEW they would eventually announce this 715 million price tag.. but they also KNEW the Canadian people would be angered at such a high price.
BUT WAIT, BUT WAIT, that's not even the double speak.
read carefully:
"Canada plans to have 15,000 police officers, private security and military personnel at the Olympics, at an expected cost of at least $715 million.
--AT LEAST?? --EXPECTED??
so we can clearly see, this news article is not the truth.
It is a government sponsored piece, used to slowly condition the Canadian mind to except ONE BILLION being spent for ""security""
of course 1 billion is an absurd number. There is no justification for spending a BILLION dollars. THE GOVERNMENT IS OVERPAYING AND THEY KNOW IT.
It is a case of total corruption.
so thank you, Canadian citizen, for spending ONE F* BILLION dollars to spy on yourself.....money well spent.
here's proof in the pudding...
THIS IS AN AMAZING PARAGRAPH & Orwellian to the core. It's written by Jeremy Hainsworth in "the guardian" online.
"Canada plans to have 15,000 police officers, private security and military personnel at the Olympics, at an expected cost of at least $715 million. That's more than five times the original estimate, which didn't take into account the need to secure areas outside the official venues. "
5 TIMES! 5 TIMES the original estimate? Of course they KNEW they would eventually announce this 715 million price tag.. but they also KNEW the Canadian people would be angered at such a high price.
BUT WAIT, BUT WAIT, that's not even the double speak.
read carefully:
"Canada plans to have 15,000 police officers, private security and military personnel at the Olympics, at an expected cost of at least $715 million.
--AT LEAST?? --EXPECTED??
so we can clearly see, this news article is not the truth.
It is a government sponsored piece, used to slowly condition the Canadian mind to except ONE BILLION being spent for ""security""
of course 1 billion is an absurd number. There is no justification for spending a BILLION dollars. THE GOVERNMENT IS OVERPAYING AND THEY KNOW IT.
It is a case of total corruption.
so thank you, Canadian citizen, for spending ONE F* BILLION dollars to spy on yourself.....money well spent.
The People Are The Enemy!
The police state being built around us was never intended solely for Islamic terrorists.
The RCMP now openly admits that the biggest treat in 2009 are Canadian citizens.
In a disgraceful display of tyrannical narcissism, RCMP constable Mike Smook of the Integrated Security Unit went out into the public in an attempt to spy on Olympic protesters.
He approached downtown bookstore owner Robert Garfat for information about private, "free" Canadian citizens. These conscientious objectors have broken no law, yet find themselves the target of government surveillance. Apparently it never crossed the mind of little mr. smoot that Robert Garafat would warn the public.
there were others as well,
An article in the pacific free press by Zoe Blunt states,
"A second local activist -- who asked not to be named -- says the police have come to his door asking to speak to all the residents, as well as taking pictures of everyone who came and left the building."
WAKE UP PEOPLE.
In a free society, the government does not spy on non violent citizens.
In a free society, you are not filmed at every street corner.
In a free society, you are not subject to random checkpoints.
In a free society, the police don't ignore the charter of rights and freedoms.
read about the intimidation tactics of our government.
here: http://www.pacificfreepress.com/news/1/3700-rcmp-canvassing-the-activist-community-for-olympic-rats.html
The RCMP now openly admits that the biggest treat in 2009 are Canadian citizens.
In a disgraceful display of tyrannical narcissism, RCMP constable Mike Smook of the Integrated Security Unit went out into the public in an attempt to spy on Olympic protesters.
He approached downtown bookstore owner Robert Garfat for information about private, "free" Canadian citizens. These conscientious objectors have broken no law, yet find themselves the target of government surveillance. Apparently it never crossed the mind of little mr. smoot that Robert Garafat would warn the public.
there were others as well,
An article in the pacific free press by Zoe Blunt states,
"A second local activist -- who asked not to be named -- says the police have come to his door asking to speak to all the residents, as well as taking pictures of everyone who came and left the building."
WAKE UP PEOPLE.
In a free society, the government does not spy on non violent citizens.
In a free society, you are not filmed at every street corner.
In a free society, you are not subject to random checkpoints.
In a free society, the police don't ignore the charter of rights and freedoms.
read about the intimidation tactics of our government.
here: http://www.pacificfreepress.com/news/1/3700-rcmp-canvassing-the-activist-community-for-olympic-rats.html
...and when they came for the homeless.
no one seems to mind allowing the government to intrude on the privacy of homeless.....i mean, there homeless right?
http://www.infowars.com/homeless-in-canada-have-fingerprints-scanned/
http://www.infowars.com/homeless-in-canada-have-fingerprints-scanned/
Friday, May 8, 2009
The U.N., Eugenics, and the Mass Media
The UN, Eugenics and the Mass Media
Jurriaan Maessen
Infowars May 8, 2009
A March 2009 policy brief by the United Nations Population Division reveals that the long-term plan for worldwide population reduction is not going fast enough, not by a long shot. Under the desperate headline ‘What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?’ the policy brief gives an overview of the progress made by developing countries in regards to the globalists set goal of reducing population and proposes several ways of speeding up the death. Richly draped with graphic illustrations on the state of global population and the progress made by the UN to bring back fertility to ‘acceptable’ levels, the policy brief advises an increased effort on the part of governments to commit to a strict family planning- policy and other measures designed to bring a halt to life.
In New York in December 1994, the United Nations’ participants came up with some practical solutions to the ‘population problem’ — one of which is the integration of population issues with matters of ‘environment’ and ‘human development.’
‘The persistence of high fertility in the majority of the least developed countries and the slow fertility reductions observed among them are associated with high levels of unmet need for family planning.(…) The reduction of fertility could be accelerated if effective measures were taken to satisfy the existing unmet need for family planning.’
After these recommendations, the authors plunge into a long, wailing lament about the slow progress of the desired reducing of the population. They also point the finger to a lack of commitment of the governments concerned and, as expected, the need for a global intervention in order to avoid certain destruction.
This recent policy brief was just one update out of many in regards to the long-term plan by the elite to significantly bring down the numbers of the existing earth population. From the moment the Rockefeller funded ‘family planning’-machine was widely kicked off in the 1960s and 70s, numerous meetings have been held in the last couple of decades where various strategies were discussed to implement population-reduction on as large a scale as possible. The strategies in question were especially directed towards the third world as the globalists had virtual carte blanche in the impoverished developing countries. The famous 1994 population conference in Cairo outlined some of the proposed strategies to be implemented. Then Secretary-General of the UN, Boutros Boutros-Ghali in his opening statement on the International Conference on Population and Development, stated that:
‘I am not exaggerating when I say that not only does the future of the human society depend on this Conference but also the efficacy of the economic order of the planet on which we live.’
During a follow-up-meeting held in New York on December 1994, the United Nations’ participants came up with some practical solutions to the ‘population problem’ - one of which is the integration of population issues with matters of ‘environment’ and ‘human development.’ Another part of the agenda of pressing people to cut down on the number of children was to combine the issue of family-planning with environmental issues:
‘Several priority areas were identified that needed immediate action by the participants. These included creation of awareness of the interrelationships between environment, population and development; advocacy; education; training; population management; gender concerns; monitoring and evaluation; and information dissemination and networking.’
Under the headline: ‘Youth NGOs Agree to Integrate Environment and Population Issues in their Activities’ were mentioned the following activities to brainwash young NGO’s into the right mindset by, again, mixing in environmental issues with population issues:
‘To cooperatively address development problems from the youth perspective, which will ensure their maximum participation, a Working Group of the Regional Consultation of Youth NGOs in Asia and the Pacific was organized in 1994 to mobilize a network of youth NGOs in the region. Among the current issues identified by the Working Group as requiring priority attention were the problems dealing with population, environment and sustainable development. Hence, a Working Group Meeting of the Regional Consultation of Youth NGOs in Asia and the Pacific was held from 19-21 April 1995 at the UNESCO PROAP to discuss and shape a plan of action integrating issues on environment, population and development for consideration by the youth NGOs. (…) To help them develop a relevant plan of action, the participants were exposed and sensitized to the current policies and programmes adopted by FAO, UNEP, UNFPA, and UNESCO in the areas of population, environment and development.’
Further on the use of mass-media is being proposed as effective ‘carriers of population-information’ to hammer dehumanization into the collective consciousness:
‘With more than 2 billion radios in the world, roughly one for every three people, and growing number of televisions, the electronic media plays an increasingly important and influential role in building awareness of population and other development issues.’
The report continues with a prime example of predictive programming:
‘Radio and television soap operas featuring family planning themes, popular songs on population-related issues, and phone-in question-and-answer sessions have all had an impact in different countries. The use of such media can be very important where literacy is low or where written information is not widely circulated. A TV soap opera series is credited with bringing thousands to family planning clinics in Mexico, and night-time drama series integrating family planning themes have proved successful in Egypt, Nigeria and Turkey.‘
In a January 1994 preparation meeting for the Cairo conference called ‘Family Planning Communications Strategies Examined’ the issue was discussed how best to use the media to create tolerance among the general public and ‘how attitudes and beliefs could be changed through the innovative use of traditional and mass media.’
‘The meeting featured case studies and presentations by communication practitioners and covered a wide range of subjects, such as: the use of folk tradition and drama to organize community action in Egypt; the use of micro-communications to encourage acceptance of family planning in the Philippines; the use of traditional and modern media in Ghana; and the use of songs to propagate family planning messages in Latin America. The success in India and Mexico of radio and television soap operas and films on family planning subjects was also discussed.’
During the meeting the Executive Coordinator of the ICPD, Jyoti Shankar Singh, stressed the importance of using mass media to ‘convey family planning and reproductive health messages’:
‘Electronic media, print media (and) interpersonal interventions were all part of the kind of comprehensive information, education and communication (IEC) strategies we need in pursuit of population goals.’
In another technical report (‘Guidelines on Basic Education with special attention to Gender Disparities for the UN Resident Coordinator System’) the message is repeatedly conveyed that:
‘It is important that information be disseminated through various channels including traditional means and packaged in various forms to allow both literate and illiterate persons to understand the key messages.’
In 1997 the UNFPA organized a ‘Regional Media Seminar on Population and Development’ for the role of the mass media in (euphemistically called) ‘Information Repackaging’ for the Pacific islands. The UN officials boasted on the success of the seminar:
‘The seminar brought together journalists in the print and radio media from 9 countries of the South Pacific to explore both the role and potential of mass media as a vehicle for population advocacy, information, education and communication. (…) The seminar explored the role of the media in developing and packaging population materials for identified target groups. The meeting also provided development partners with an opportunity to forge networks with media personnel and develop effective strategies to better address population and development goals and accelerate the implementation of the ICPD (International Conference on Population and Development) Programme of Action.’
In other words: every possible resource should be utilized for propagandizing different target audiences. But the people burdened with designing and implement population education on a large scale emphasized the need for a common tongue and sequence of arguments with which the different UN-divisions sell the people on the idea of dehumanization.
‘Mr. Michael Vlassoff, Senior Technical Officer, Technical and Evaluation Division, UNFPA, introduced the work of the Working Group on Policy-Related Issues. He explained that the Working Group had decided to address the “common advocacy” concern by drawing up a Statement of Commitment that would then be issued by all agencies and organizations involved in the IATF. The aim of such a statement would be to ensure that all UN agencies and organizations use the same language regarding population and development issues.’
The report goes on to list these arguments with which populations worldwide should be lured into embracing modern-day eugenics as a sensible policy:
‘The “Statement of Commitment on Population and Development by the United Nations System”, drafted by the Working Group, is divided into three sections: a general introduction stressing the commitment by the UN agencies and organizations to implement ICPD (International Conference on Population and Development); a section on the linkages between population issues and other development issues; and a concluding section calling for global partnership in addressing these interrelated issues.’
In short- a great part of the 1990s were occupied with a great mobilization of mass media for propaganda purposes by the global elite, a test case so to speak, before implementing the same strategies worldwide in the first decade of the 21st century. And lo and behold! The great global warming swindle arrives just in time as an environmental as well as a development issue to attach the basic message to: there are too many of us- and our numbers should be reduced before the planet is destroyed. Because the warming is global, the response should be so as well. However eloquently the message may be presented by hopelessly compliant media outlets, it is the tyrant’s voice we discern amidst the chatter- and all with ears to hear should educate their neighbor in this all-out information war. Let’s not forget what the elite who have funded the UN from the moment of its very conception have always aspired. In the words of the aristocratic fiend Prince Philip:
‘If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.
Jurriaan Maessen
Infowars May 8, 2009
A March 2009 policy brief by the United Nations Population Division reveals that the long-term plan for worldwide population reduction is not going fast enough, not by a long shot. Under the desperate headline ‘What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?’ the policy brief gives an overview of the progress made by developing countries in regards to the globalists set goal of reducing population and proposes several ways of speeding up the death. Richly draped with graphic illustrations on the state of global population and the progress made by the UN to bring back fertility to ‘acceptable’ levels, the policy brief advises an increased effort on the part of governments to commit to a strict family planning- policy and other measures designed to bring a halt to life.
In New York in December 1994, the United Nations’ participants came up with some practical solutions to the ‘population problem’ — one of which is the integration of population issues with matters of ‘environment’ and ‘human development.’
‘The persistence of high fertility in the majority of the least developed countries and the slow fertility reductions observed among them are associated with high levels of unmet need for family planning.(…) The reduction of fertility could be accelerated if effective measures were taken to satisfy the existing unmet need for family planning.’
After these recommendations, the authors plunge into a long, wailing lament about the slow progress of the desired reducing of the population. They also point the finger to a lack of commitment of the governments concerned and, as expected, the need for a global intervention in order to avoid certain destruction.
This recent policy brief was just one update out of many in regards to the long-term plan by the elite to significantly bring down the numbers of the existing earth population. From the moment the Rockefeller funded ‘family planning’-machine was widely kicked off in the 1960s and 70s, numerous meetings have been held in the last couple of decades where various strategies were discussed to implement population-reduction on as large a scale as possible. The strategies in question were especially directed towards the third world as the globalists had virtual carte blanche in the impoverished developing countries. The famous 1994 population conference in Cairo outlined some of the proposed strategies to be implemented. Then Secretary-General of the UN, Boutros Boutros-Ghali in his opening statement on the International Conference on Population and Development, stated that:
‘I am not exaggerating when I say that not only does the future of the human society depend on this Conference but also the efficacy of the economic order of the planet on which we live.’
During a follow-up-meeting held in New York on December 1994, the United Nations’ participants came up with some practical solutions to the ‘population problem’ - one of which is the integration of population issues with matters of ‘environment’ and ‘human development.’ Another part of the agenda of pressing people to cut down on the number of children was to combine the issue of family-planning with environmental issues:
‘Several priority areas were identified that needed immediate action by the participants. These included creation of awareness of the interrelationships between environment, population and development; advocacy; education; training; population management; gender concerns; monitoring and evaluation; and information dissemination and networking.’
Under the headline: ‘Youth NGOs Agree to Integrate Environment and Population Issues in their Activities’ were mentioned the following activities to brainwash young NGO’s into the right mindset by, again, mixing in environmental issues with population issues:
‘To cooperatively address development problems from the youth perspective, which will ensure their maximum participation, a Working Group of the Regional Consultation of Youth NGOs in Asia and the Pacific was organized in 1994 to mobilize a network of youth NGOs in the region. Among the current issues identified by the Working Group as requiring priority attention were the problems dealing with population, environment and sustainable development. Hence, a Working Group Meeting of the Regional Consultation of Youth NGOs in Asia and the Pacific was held from 19-21 April 1995 at the UNESCO PROAP to discuss and shape a plan of action integrating issues on environment, population and development for consideration by the youth NGOs. (…) To help them develop a relevant plan of action, the participants were exposed and sensitized to the current policies and programmes adopted by FAO, UNEP, UNFPA, and UNESCO in the areas of population, environment and development.’
Further on the use of mass-media is being proposed as effective ‘carriers of population-information’ to hammer dehumanization into the collective consciousness:
‘With more than 2 billion radios in the world, roughly one for every three people, and growing number of televisions, the electronic media plays an increasingly important and influential role in building awareness of population and other development issues.’
The report continues with a prime example of predictive programming:
‘Radio and television soap operas featuring family planning themes, popular songs on population-related issues, and phone-in question-and-answer sessions have all had an impact in different countries. The use of such media can be very important where literacy is low or where written information is not widely circulated. A TV soap opera series is credited with bringing thousands to family planning clinics in Mexico, and night-time drama series integrating family planning themes have proved successful in Egypt, Nigeria and Turkey.‘
In a January 1994 preparation meeting for the Cairo conference called ‘Family Planning Communications Strategies Examined’ the issue was discussed how best to use the media to create tolerance among the general public and ‘how attitudes and beliefs could be changed through the innovative use of traditional and mass media.’
‘The meeting featured case studies and presentations by communication practitioners and covered a wide range of subjects, such as: the use of folk tradition and drama to organize community action in Egypt; the use of micro-communications to encourage acceptance of family planning in the Philippines; the use of traditional and modern media in Ghana; and the use of songs to propagate family planning messages in Latin America. The success in India and Mexico of radio and television soap operas and films on family planning subjects was also discussed.’
During the meeting the Executive Coordinator of the ICPD, Jyoti Shankar Singh, stressed the importance of using mass media to ‘convey family planning and reproductive health messages’:
‘Electronic media, print media (and) interpersonal interventions were all part of the kind of comprehensive information, education and communication (IEC) strategies we need in pursuit of population goals.’
In another technical report (‘Guidelines on Basic Education with special attention to Gender Disparities for the UN Resident Coordinator System’) the message is repeatedly conveyed that:
‘It is important that information be disseminated through various channels including traditional means and packaged in various forms to allow both literate and illiterate persons to understand the key messages.’
In 1997 the UNFPA organized a ‘Regional Media Seminar on Population and Development’ for the role of the mass media in (euphemistically called) ‘Information Repackaging’ for the Pacific islands. The UN officials boasted on the success of the seminar:
‘The seminar brought together journalists in the print and radio media from 9 countries of the South Pacific to explore both the role and potential of mass media as a vehicle for population advocacy, information, education and communication. (…) The seminar explored the role of the media in developing and packaging population materials for identified target groups. The meeting also provided development partners with an opportunity to forge networks with media personnel and develop effective strategies to better address population and development goals and accelerate the implementation of the ICPD (International Conference on Population and Development) Programme of Action.’
In other words: every possible resource should be utilized for propagandizing different target audiences. But the people burdened with designing and implement population education on a large scale emphasized the need for a common tongue and sequence of arguments with which the different UN-divisions sell the people on the idea of dehumanization.
‘Mr. Michael Vlassoff, Senior Technical Officer, Technical and Evaluation Division, UNFPA, introduced the work of the Working Group on Policy-Related Issues. He explained that the Working Group had decided to address the “common advocacy” concern by drawing up a Statement of Commitment that would then be issued by all agencies and organizations involved in the IATF. The aim of such a statement would be to ensure that all UN agencies and organizations use the same language regarding population and development issues.’
The report goes on to list these arguments with which populations worldwide should be lured into embracing modern-day eugenics as a sensible policy:
‘The “Statement of Commitment on Population and Development by the United Nations System”, drafted by the Working Group, is divided into three sections: a general introduction stressing the commitment by the UN agencies and organizations to implement ICPD (International Conference on Population and Development); a section on the linkages between population issues and other development issues; and a concluding section calling for global partnership in addressing these interrelated issues.’
In short- a great part of the 1990s were occupied with a great mobilization of mass media for propaganda purposes by the global elite, a test case so to speak, before implementing the same strategies worldwide in the first decade of the 21st century. And lo and behold! The great global warming swindle arrives just in time as an environmental as well as a development issue to attach the basic message to: there are too many of us- and our numbers should be reduced before the planet is destroyed. Because the warming is global, the response should be so as well. However eloquently the message may be presented by hopelessly compliant media outlets, it is the tyrant’s voice we discern amidst the chatter- and all with ears to hear should educate their neighbor in this all-out information war. Let’s not forget what the elite who have funded the UN from the moment of its very conception have always aspired. In the words of the aristocratic fiend Prince Philip:
‘If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Canadian Banks need Government Funds until 2010.
The Bank of Canada on April 21 reduced its benchmark lending rate to 0.25 per cent, essentially giving away money to the largest banks in Canada.
Not only is the government a "backstop" for the banks, but they are also engaged in a plan to buy toxic assets. These moves will undoubtedly increase the money supply and push inflation higher.
The central bank tried to hide this with a forecast for inflation at a mere 2 per cent by 2011.
If anyone truly believes that inflation is only moving at 2% in Canada.... you need your head examined.
The government calculates inflation WITHOUT including food and energy costs.. WHAT??? those are the MOST IMPORTANT figures when calculating inflation.
That is like counting the cars in a parking lot, but excluding ford and Chrysler. This exclusion is so sever it renders the data meaningless.
read about the legalized theft here:
http://business.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090506.wcarney0506/BNStory/Business/home
Not only is the government a "backstop" for the banks, but they are also engaged in a plan to buy toxic assets. These moves will undoubtedly increase the money supply and push inflation higher.
The central bank tried to hide this with a forecast for inflation at a mere 2 per cent by 2011.
If anyone truly believes that inflation is only moving at 2% in Canada.... you need your head examined.
The government calculates inflation WITHOUT including food and energy costs.. WHAT??? those are the MOST IMPORTANT figures when calculating inflation.
That is like counting the cars in a parking lot, but excluding ford and Chrysler. This exclusion is so sever it renders the data meaningless.
read about the legalized theft here:
http://business.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090506.wcarney0506/BNStory/Business/home
Rupert Murdoch's Plan to Kill the Internet
Websites like this one are doing so much damage to the globalist agenda,
they have no option but remove the Internet from the hands of the plebes.
google the phrase "Internet 2".
the Internet is dying,
and its about much more than just paying fees....
its about controlling content.
http://www.infowars.com/rupert-murdoch-internet-will-soon-be-over/
they have no option but remove the Internet from the hands of the plebes.
google the phrase "Internet 2".
the Internet is dying,
and its about much more than just paying fees....
its about controlling content.
http://www.infowars.com/rupert-murdoch-internet-will-soon-be-over/
Bio metrics, x-ray scanning in canadian airports
here is some of the new spending for airport security in 2009
$9.2 million for non-passenger and vehicle access control and screening at critical restricted areas of airports, using biometric identification technology;
- $8.6 million for advanced mobile screening equipment for the random screening of passengers and baggage for higher-risk charters and government flights departing from fixed-base operations; and
- $82.3 million for advanced, internationally compatible passenger and baggage screening equipment that will strengthen security and speed up the screening process. Some of this new technology includes:
- $25 million for 125 new multi-view x-ray units at screening checkpoints at Edmonton, Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver and Winnipeg international airports;
- $6 million for 18 new screening lanes in Montreal, Vancouver, Edmonton, Winnipeg and Toronto;
- $12.8 million to support our Olympic and Paralympic partners to ensure Canada's security requirements are met. This includes the acquisition of portable security units (PSUs) to deliver efficient screening operations during the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games. The PSUs will be built in Canada with environmentally friendly materials.
- $242.9 million to support CATSA's ongoing operations and to allow the hiring of additional screening officers and oversight officers.
and the full article here: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/May2009/05/c8470.html
$9.2 million for non-passenger and vehicle access control and screening at critical restricted areas of airports, using biometric identification technology;
- $8.6 million for advanced mobile screening equipment for the random screening of passengers and baggage for higher-risk charters and government flights departing from fixed-base operations; and
- $82.3 million for advanced, internationally compatible passenger and baggage screening equipment that will strengthen security and speed up the screening process. Some of this new technology includes:
- $25 million for 125 new multi-view x-ray units at screening checkpoints at Edmonton, Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver and Winnipeg international airports;
- $6 million for 18 new screening lanes in Montreal, Vancouver, Edmonton, Winnipeg and Toronto;
- $12.8 million to support our Olympic and Paralympic partners to ensure Canada's security requirements are met. This includes the acquisition of portable security units (PSUs) to deliver efficient screening operations during the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games. The PSUs will be built in Canada with environmentally friendly materials.
- $242.9 million to support CATSA's ongoing operations and to allow the hiring of additional screening officers and oversight officers.
and the full article here: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/May2009/05/c8470.html
Canadian Police State Update
the 2010 Olympic games will be held in Vancouver BC. Th e provincial government as well as the feds in Ottawa are salivating at the opportunity to build a control grid for the Canadian people.
a high tech security system is being installed, and billionaires are making hundreds of millions off the Canadian people by jacking up the prices in their lucrative security deals.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5jMc5tq-BqqE04_jkq8shGS1rJPFA
and of course Canadians will be viewed as suspects until WE can prove our innocents...
http://www.theprovince.com/sports/2010wintergames/Boaters+face+security+gauntlet+False+Creek+during+2010+Games/1548112/story.html
prepare to surrender your right to be secure in your serson and your property....the the states thsi is the violation of the 4th amendment.:
here: http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/olympics/2009/04/30/canada_prepare_to_be_boarded.html
a high tech security system is being installed, and billionaires are making hundreds of millions off the Canadian people by jacking up the prices in their lucrative security deals.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5jMc5tq-BqqE04_jkq8shGS1rJPFA
and of course Canadians will be viewed as suspects until WE can prove our innocents...
http://www.theprovince.com/sports/2010wintergames/Boaters+face+security+gauntlet+False+Creek+during+2010+Games/1548112/story.html
prepare to surrender your right to be secure in your serson and your property....the the states thsi is the violation of the 4th amendment.:
here: http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/olympics/2009/04/30/canada_prepare_to_be_boarded.html
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
Canadian Military train with Police
The militarization of the Canadian police.
http://www.thebarrieexaminer.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1554638
http://www.thebarrieexaminer.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1554638
Alex Jones Channel Banned by Youtube
media conglomerates working together to silence the public.
The Youtube account known as "thealexjoneschannel" was banned by YouTube.
check out all the info at:
http://www.infowars.com/call-to-rock-youtube-for-taking-down-the-alex-jones-channel/
The Youtube account known as "thealexjoneschannel" was banned by YouTube.
check out all the info at:
http://www.infowars.com/call-to-rock-youtube-for-taking-down-the-alex-jones-channel/
Boy Arrested Under Patriot Act
http://www.infowars.com/wral-5-news-report-on-boy-arrested-under-the-patriot-act/
the police state is not for terrorists.
it is for you!
the police state is not for terrorists.
it is for you!
Is your blog a weapon?
Is Your Blog a Weapon?
Text size
Xeni JardinBoingBoingMay 5, 2009
Law prof Eugene Volokh blogs about a U.S. House of Representatives bill proposed by Rep. Linda T. Sanchez and 14 others that could make it a federal felony to use your blog, social media like MySpace and Facebook, or any other web media “To Cause Substantial Emotional Distress Through “Severe, Repeated, and Hostile” Speech.” Oh lordy, there goes 4chan.
Here’s the relevant text:
Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both….
["Communication"] means the electronic transmission, between or among points specified by the user, of information of the user’s choosing, without change in the form or content of the information as sent and received; …
["Electronic means"] means any equipment dependent on electrical power to access an information service, including email, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones, and text messages.
Jacob Sullum at Reason thinks the proposed law is stupid, too.
It was bad enough that a grandstanding U.S. attorney successfully prosecuted Lori Drew, a Missouri woman who participated in a cruel MySpace prank that apparently precipitated the 2006 suicide of 13-year-old Megan Meier, under an anti-hacking law that clearly was not intended for this sort of situation. Now Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.) and 14 of her colleagues want to make such prosecutions easier through a breathtakingly broad bill that would criminalize a wide range of speech protected by the First Amendment. The Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act would make it a felony punishable by up to two years in prison to transmit an electronic communication (”including email, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones, and text messages”) “with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person…to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior.”
Text size
Xeni JardinBoingBoingMay 5, 2009
Law prof Eugene Volokh blogs about a U.S. House of Representatives bill proposed by Rep. Linda T. Sanchez and 14 others that could make it a federal felony to use your blog, social media like MySpace and Facebook, or any other web media “To Cause Substantial Emotional Distress Through “Severe, Repeated, and Hostile” Speech.” Oh lordy, there goes 4chan.
Here’s the relevant text:
Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both….
["Communication"] means the electronic transmission, between or among points specified by the user, of information of the user’s choosing, without change in the form or content of the information as sent and received; …
["Electronic means"] means any equipment dependent on electrical power to access an information service, including email, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones, and text messages.
Jacob Sullum at Reason thinks the proposed law is stupid, too.
It was bad enough that a grandstanding U.S. attorney successfully prosecuted Lori Drew, a Missouri woman who participated in a cruel MySpace prank that apparently precipitated the 2006 suicide of 13-year-old Megan Meier, under an anti-hacking law that clearly was not intended for this sort of situation. Now Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.) and 14 of her colleagues want to make such prosecutions easier through a breathtakingly broad bill that would criminalize a wide range of speech protected by the First Amendment. The Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act would make it a felony punishable by up to two years in prison to transmit an electronic communication (”including email, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones, and text messages”) “with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person…to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior.”
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
this article is a MUST READ
written by: Dr. Housing bubble
see the full article at his blog.
The Paradox of Spendthrifts - Government Offering 0 Percent on I Savings Bonds and Creating Incentives to Spend. Punishing the Prudent and Savers. $115 Trillion in total U.S. Debt.
written by: Dr. Housing bubble
see the full article at his blog.
The Paradox of Spendthrifts - Government Offering 0 Percent on I Savings Bonds and Creating Incentives to Spend. Punishing the Prudent and Savers. $115 Trillion in total U.S. Debt.
I Applied My Heart to Know
I Applied Mine Heart to Know (My Blog)
By Stephen Smith
2I applied mine heart to know, and to search, and to seek out wisdom, and the reason of things,
Ecclesiastes 7:25
Be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you. 1Peter 3:15
Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a workman who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth. II Timothy 2:15
. Four Great Questions of Life:
Who am I? (What am I worth?)
Where did I come from?
Why am I here?
Where am I going when I die?
3Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lust. 4And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. 5For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water. 2 Peter 3:3-5
We must ask ourselves, how did I get here with this consciousness and awareness? No other animal comprehends the universe in the depth and complexity that is common in humans. How did feelings like Love, Loyalty, Justice, Understanding & Mercy Evolve? More importantly why? Helping others and giving of oneself is a 2000 year concept that runs contrary to evolutionary processes. What other species helps its less fortunate in the manner we do?
The Great Global Warming Swindle
Professor Tim Ball – Department of Climatology - University of Winnipeg.
Dr. Roy Spencer – NASA Climatologist.
There is such intolerance of any dissenting voice. (Much like communism.) The most politically Incorrect thing to do, is to doubt this global warming orthodoxy. Its gone way beyond politics, it’s a new kind of morality. (In replace of the morality set forth by God and the Bible.)
The ACTUAL scientific evidence for global warming is crumbling.
There are periods in history where co2 was ten times greater than there is now. You can’t say CO2 will drive climate change. It certainly never did in the past.
Christopher Monckton has produced a devastating critique of the summary in the light of what this draft scientific evidence says. He writes:
Figures in the final draft of the UN’s fourth five-year report on climate change show that the previous report, in 2001, had overestimated the human influence on the climate since the Industrial Revolution by at least one-third. Also, the UN, in its 2007 report, has more than halved its high-end best estimate of the rise in sea level by 2100 from 3 feet to just 17 inches. It suggests that the rate of sea-level rise is up from 2mm/yr to 3mm/year – no more than one foot in a century. UN scientists faced several problems their computer models had not predicted. Globally, temperature is not rising at all, and sea level is not rising anything like as fast as had been forecast. Concentrations of methane in the air are actually falling…
The draft of the science chapters, now being circulated to governments for last-minute comments, reveals that the tendency of computers to over-predict rises in temperature and sea level has forced a major rethink. The report’s generally more cautiously-expressed projections confirm scientists’ warnings that the UN’s heavy reliance on computer models had exaggerated the temperature effect of greenhouse-gas emissions…Though carbon dioxide in the air is increasing, global temperature is not. Figures from the US National Climate Data Center show 2006 as about 0.03 degrees Celsius warmer worldwide than 2001. Since that is within the range of measurement error, global temperature has not risen in a statistically significant sense since the UN’s last report in 2001…
Though the mass media are now well-programmed to focus on the more alarmist aspects of the report, the halving of the sea-level projection is in effect a declaration, from the heart of the ‘consensus’, that the consequences of warmer worldwide weather will be minor and may be beneficial, that the worst scenarios are no longer probable, and that the panic is officially over.
By Stephen Smith
2I applied mine heart to know, and to search, and to seek out wisdom, and the reason of things,
Ecclesiastes 7:25
Be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you. 1Peter 3:15
Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a workman who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth. II Timothy 2:15
. Four Great Questions of Life:
Who am I? (What am I worth?)
Where did I come from?
Why am I here?
Where am I going when I die?
3Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lust. 4And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. 5For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water. 2 Peter 3:3-5
We must ask ourselves, how did I get here with this consciousness and awareness? No other animal comprehends the universe in the depth and complexity that is common in humans. How did feelings like Love, Loyalty, Justice, Understanding & Mercy Evolve? More importantly why? Helping others and giving of oneself is a 2000 year concept that runs contrary to evolutionary processes. What other species helps its less fortunate in the manner we do?
The Great Global Warming Swindle
Professor Tim Ball – Department of Climatology - University of Winnipeg.
Dr. Roy Spencer – NASA Climatologist.
There is such intolerance of any dissenting voice. (Much like communism.) The most politically Incorrect thing to do, is to doubt this global warming orthodoxy. Its gone way beyond politics, it’s a new kind of morality. (In replace of the morality set forth by God and the Bible.)
The ACTUAL scientific evidence for global warming is crumbling.
There are periods in history where co2 was ten times greater than there is now. You can’t say CO2 will drive climate change. It certainly never did in the past.
Christopher Monckton has produced a devastating critique of the summary in the light of what this draft scientific evidence says. He writes:
Figures in the final draft of the UN’s fourth five-year report on climate change show that the previous report, in 2001, had overestimated the human influence on the climate since the Industrial Revolution by at least one-third. Also, the UN, in its 2007 report, has more than halved its high-end best estimate of the rise in sea level by 2100 from 3 feet to just 17 inches. It suggests that the rate of sea-level rise is up from 2mm/yr to 3mm/year – no more than one foot in a century. UN scientists faced several problems their computer models had not predicted. Globally, temperature is not rising at all, and sea level is not rising anything like as fast as had been forecast. Concentrations of methane in the air are actually falling…
The draft of the science chapters, now being circulated to governments for last-minute comments, reveals that the tendency of computers to over-predict rises in temperature and sea level has forced a major rethink. The report’s generally more cautiously-expressed projections confirm scientists’ warnings that the UN’s heavy reliance on computer models had exaggerated the temperature effect of greenhouse-gas emissions…Though carbon dioxide in the air is increasing, global temperature is not. Figures from the US National Climate Data Center show 2006 as about 0.03 degrees Celsius warmer worldwide than 2001. Since that is within the range of measurement error, global temperature has not risen in a statistically significant sense since the UN’s last report in 2001…
Though the mass media are now well-programmed to focus on the more alarmist aspects of the report, the halving of the sea-level projection is in effect a declaration, from the heart of the ‘consensus’, that the consequences of warmer worldwide weather will be minor and may be beneficial, that the worst scenarios are no longer probable, and that the panic is officially over.
cnadian police state
here is the media preparing us for cameras on the streets.
http://www2.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/comment/story.html?id=dac3a226-1ea5-4389-8faf-4d391c4b4da1
and the Canadian military being used to patrol the people. No free nation uses the military for domestic security...err..except Canada
http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Olympics/2010Vancouver/News/2009/04/29/9284246-cp.html
Canadian government hiring private mercenaries to patrol and intimidate the people. private firms are used to shield the government from culpability WHEN rights are violated.
again...this is illegal in a truly free nation.
The military/police state is not for Al Queda, its for Canadian citizens. Because the security does no good for the "stated goal".
http://www2.seattlepi.com/articles/405176.html
the entire Olympic saga is a huge boondoggle. corruption will be rampant, and the citizens will get screwed...GUARANTEED.
http://www.straight.com/article-215512/report-criticizes-olympic-organizers-lack-transparency
VIDEO PROOF that our government uses provocateurs to start riots, and will again for the Olympic protesters.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St1-WTc1kow
the 2 most important video's you will ever watch
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8484911570371055528
&
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1070329053600562261
http://www2.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/comment/story.html?id=dac3a226-1ea5-4389-8faf-4d391c4b4da1
and the Canadian military being used to patrol the people. No free nation uses the military for domestic security...err..except Canada
http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Olympics/2010Vancouver/News/2009/04/29/9284246-cp.html
Canadian government hiring private mercenaries to patrol and intimidate the people. private firms are used to shield the government from culpability WHEN rights are violated.
again...this is illegal in a truly free nation.
The military/police state is not for Al Queda, its for Canadian citizens. Because the security does no good for the "stated goal".
http://www2.seattlepi.com/articles/405176.html
the entire Olympic saga is a huge boondoggle. corruption will be rampant, and the citizens will get screwed...GUARANTEED.
http://www.straight.com/article-215512/report-criticizes-olympic-organizers-lack-transparency
VIDEO PROOF that our government uses provocateurs to start riots, and will again for the Olympic protesters.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St1-WTc1kow
the 2 most important video's you will ever watch
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8484911570371055528
&
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1070329053600562261
Max Keiser on the economic crisis
As for the economic crisis, I take the long view, which is:
If you go back to the 1350 period during feudalism, the only thing that gave rise to the middle class, the only thing that gave rise to the ability of non nobility to negotiate a wage was the black plague in Europe. This wiped out virtually 1/2 the population.
It was only after this that you had the rise of a middle class.
Because the Kings and Lords now needed people to work on their estates. They were willing to pay a higher wage. That was the beginning of what we call the middle class.
But the nobility wasn't happy about this. The aristocrats and nobility didn't want a middle class. They don't want people with social mobility. They don't want democracy..
It's inconvenient for them!
They want everything back... and they are back in force!
And our bankers create what i call a financial hologram.
It's just flickering images in the context of some one's ledger...but there is no value there.
Unemployment is skyrocketing in America.
People don't have any net worth.
There's no benefits left in America.
Their home value has been eviscerated.
Where's the value?
Where's the people wealth? What happened to it"
It's been stolen, that's what happened to it!
If you go back to the 1350 period during feudalism, the only thing that gave rise to the middle class, the only thing that gave rise to the ability of non nobility to negotiate a wage was the black plague in Europe. This wiped out virtually 1/2 the population.
It was only after this that you had the rise of a middle class.
Because the Kings and Lords now needed people to work on their estates. They were willing to pay a higher wage. That was the beginning of what we call the middle class.
But the nobility wasn't happy about this. The aristocrats and nobility didn't want a middle class. They don't want people with social mobility. They don't want democracy..
It's inconvenient for them!
They want everything back... and they are back in force!
And our bankers create what i call a financial hologram.
It's just flickering images in the context of some one's ledger...but there is no value there.
Unemployment is skyrocketing in America.
People don't have any net worth.
There's no benefits left in America.
Their home value has been eviscerated.
Where's the value?
Where's the people wealth? What happened to it"
It's been stolen, that's what happened to it!
In defense of Liberty pt. 1
this will be are open ended, free flowing series articles that defend the notion of human and economic liberty.
Liberty vs. Tyranny - The Liberty movement vs. the New World Order.
this site is dedicated to tracking Canada's role in the coming global government.
It's not about left or right.
It's about freedom vs. tyranny
The well documented plan for global governance is commonly referred to as the New World Order. It is not a conspiracy theory.
Major media outlets such as the Wall St. journal, Washinton Post, Financial Times of London and Faux news, have roported on the new world order and its world government.
We seek to expose the governments plan to further militarize society under the rubric of terrorism. We are here to speak out against the growing police state that continually points cameras in our faces.
we will document the world elite's plan to centralize world power under world bodies such as the united nations, world health organization, world court, IMF, world bank, and numerous non-governmental agencies.
We will extensively document the financial Holocaust going on right now on wall st. and around the world. The banker bailout we be documented in detail.
We also hope to have a section of the website dedicated to survival plans and techniques.
we have a huge list of essential links to information you can't get from the controlled-corporate media.
check out or reading assignments if you want to stay n the front lines of the info war.
We also will have an extensive archive of videos that are a must for an Canadian who values their life and liberty.
feel free to leave comments, and submit articles.
It's not about left or right.
It's about freedom vs. tyranny
The well documented plan for global governance is commonly referred to as the New World Order. It is not a conspiracy theory.
Major media outlets such as the Wall St. journal, Washinton Post, Financial Times of London and Faux news, have roported on the new world order and its world government.
We seek to expose the governments plan to further militarize society under the rubric of terrorism. We are here to speak out against the growing police state that continually points cameras in our faces.
we will document the world elite's plan to centralize world power under world bodies such as the united nations, world health organization, world court, IMF, world bank, and numerous non-governmental agencies.
We will extensively document the financial Holocaust going on right now on wall st. and around the world. The banker bailout we be documented in detail.
We also hope to have a section of the website dedicated to survival plans and techniques.
we have a huge list of essential links to information you can't get from the controlled-corporate media.
check out or reading assignments if you want to stay n the front lines of the info war.
We also will have an extensive archive of videos that are a must for an Canadian who values their life and liberty.
feel free to leave comments, and submit articles.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)