I Applied Mine Heart to Know (My Blog)
By Stephen Smith
2I applied mine heart to know, and to search, and to seek out wisdom, and the reason of things,
Be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you. 1Peter 3:15
Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a workman who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth. II Timothy 2:15
. Four Great Questions of Life:
Who am I? (What am I worth?)
Where did I come from?
Why am I here?
Where am I going when I die?
3Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lust. 4And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. 5For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water. 2 Peter 3:3-5
We must ask ourselves, how did I get here with this consciousness and awareness? No other animal comprehends the universe in the depth and complexity that is common in humans. How did feelings like Love, Loyalty, Justice, Understanding & Mercy Evolve? More importantly why? Helping others and giving of oneself is a 2000 year concept that runs contrary to evolutionary processes. What other species helps its less fortunate in the manner we do?
The Great Global Warming Swindle
Professor Tim Ball – Department of Climatology - University of Winnipeg.
Dr. Roy Spencer – NASA Climatologist.
There is such intolerance of any dissenting voice. (Much like communism.) The most politically Incorrect thing to do, is to doubt this global warming orthodoxy. Its gone way beyond politics, it’s a new kind of morality. (In replace of the morality set forth by God and the Bible.)
The ACTUAL scientific evidence for global warming is crumbling.
There are periods in history where co2 was ten times greater than there is now. You can’t say CO2 will drive climate change. It certainly never did in the past.
Christopher Monckton has produced a devastating critique of the summary in the light of what this draft scientific evidence says. He writes:
Figures in the final draft of the UN’s fourth five-year report on climate change show that the previous report, in 2001, had overestimated the human influence on the climate since the Industrial Revolution by at least one-third. Also, the UN, in its 2007 report, has more than halved its high-end best estimate of the rise in sea level by 2100 from 3 feet to just 17 inches. It suggests that the rate of sea-level rise is up from 2mm/yr to 3mm/year – no more than one foot in a century. UN scientists faced several problems their computer models had not predicted. Globally, temperature is not rising at all, and sea level is not rising anything like as fast as had been forecast. Concentrations of methane in the air are actually falling…
The draft of the science chapters, now being circulated to governments for last-minute comments, reveals that the tendency of computers to over-predict rises in temperature and sea level has forced a major rethink. The report’s generally more cautiously-expressed projections confirm scientists’ warnings that the UN’s heavy reliance on computer models had exaggerated the temperature effect of greenhouse-gas emissions…Though carbon dioxide in the air is increasing, global temperature is not. Figures from the US National Climate Data Center show 2006 as about 0.03 degrees Celsius warmer worldwide than 2001. Since that is within the range of measurement error, global temperature has not risen in a statistically significant sense since the UN’s last report in 2001…
Though the mass media are now well-programmed to focus on the more alarmist aspects of the report, the halving of the sea-level projection is in effect a declaration, from the heart of the ‘consensus’, that the consequences of warmer worldwide weather will be minor and may be beneficial, that the worst scenarios are no longer probable, and that the panic is officially over.