Michael c. Ruppert make a compelling case in his book "Crossing the Rubicon" that Dick Cheney had the means, the motive, and the opportunity to orchestrate the events on 9/11. Much of his information is critical in the empirical timeline of that day. The "means" by which the treasonous perpetrators were able to accomplish their coup, are correctly analogued by he and others. I believe, however, that the "motive" and the "opportunity" for the crime, surrounded neither Dick Cheney, nor peak oil.
I will start with peak oil.
Speaking of means and motive. the head of any multi-billion dollar oil company is Always concerned with the bottom line. Before extending any excess capital. they need to be assured that the budget is safely secured. Make sure to not be overextended if the current revenue projections were to drop. That seems elementary. Well the greatest variable in the bottom line, is the market Price of crude oil.
If there was a way to secure ever increasing profits & ever expanding bottom lines, it would be notion that it is running out!! It's not hard to understand why any CEO would immediately see why the theory of peak oil is positive in securing the profits for his companies investors.
Ruppert points out that oil discoveries have dropped for more than 3 decades....which is quite compelling. But again it is any poker players interest to conceal his cards. And in a game of global hold em' petrol style....it's in no ones interest to report massive new discoveries.
Another aspect of this is the control of technology. The evolution & assimilation of the Internet into the economy shows how government and enterprise can control technology as needed. When the day peak oil actually comes...and goes.. i believe the "energy Internet" will be created.
On a geopolitical level, peak oil gives puppet politicians and Dis Info agents the fake "motive" for 9/11.
now the opportunity.
The conspiracy involved numerous people. Many of the people involved almost certainly were inside or close to the military. People from the CIA and foreign intelligence agencies were likely involved. People within finance, intelligence, defence, and security could have ALL been involved...worldwide....
I ask you,
would a criminal ring of ruthless conspirators, give control of the entire operation to a man whos had 5 bypass surgeries, 18 stints, and a pacemaker? Seems risky to me, not to you? If he were to peace-out in a seminal moment, the entire operation could be exposed. If i were they, Cheney would only have control over situations in which, if he were to die, it would only create more confusion. Cause more problems for the true defenders of America. His role could only be for things by which a heart attack played in their favor.
therefore, Mike Ruppert's claim that peak oil was the central underlying motive...insomuch as it being a REALITY, is suspect. Also the opportunity, specifically dick Cheney's opportunity to orchestrate the entire operation...is also suspect.
It makes more sense to me that the planners of the "micro-details"...not the possible planner of some macro details... who are the actual masterminds of the crime. Men within our own military, CIA, and FBI. Men like General Meyers, or Dave Frasca....or most likely -ex military brass controlling the operation from a private security/intelligence bunker. Not a public, already hated, already scrutinized man, who could die at any time...and takle with his to the grave, the suspecians of millions of trut seekers..
The question now must be asked.... does Ruppert's Rubicon provide the best, most likely thesis for the 9/11 cover up? Or does he spin a tale that winds through the shady weeds of non essential and compartmentalized decision makers